My research lab is starting to work with a team of colleagues on a project that will investigate potential effects of wind turbines on prairie-chickens. Such information may be helpful to folks who make decisions about where to put turbines in grasslands.
As you roam the green earth, sometimes you find a scene that just begs to be photographed. Today's Photo Focus is one of those scenes, from the rangelands of Nebraska's Sandhills near Ainsworth, NE.
Life on the Great Plains. Ideas, perspectives, issues, and observations from a wildlife ecologist.
June 29, 2012
June 23, 2012
Pheasants like managed CRP in eastern Nebraska
One of Ty's radio-marked hens on her nest. Photo courtesy of NEBRASKAland Magazine/Nebraska Game and Parks Commission |
The research project that started this focus was a project on pheasants in northeastern Nebraska. NGPC and Pheasants Forever had established a landscape with a high level of CRP grasslands, and the grasslands were managed during their 10-year contract by discing and interseeding a clover-type mix. Would this management attract pheasants? Would their nest and brood survival increase?
The answer to both questions turned out to be "Yes!"
And, both papers from Dr. Ty Matthews' dissertation are now published in the Journal of Wildlife Management, available now as Early View papers:
Ring-necked pheasant hens select managed Conservation Reserve Program grasslands for nesting and brood-rearing -- available here
Mid-contract management of Conservation Reserve Program grasslands provides benefits for ring-necked pheasant nest and brood survival -- available here
The latter papers shows that pheasant hens that nest in these managed CRP habitats can double their productivity, providing many opportunities for hunters in the fall.
All of this is great news for land managers, and our study confirmed that all of the public/private partnerships between landowners, NGPC, and Pheasants Forever to accomplish the management were worth the effort. Unfortunately, the post-mortem on the project is that this unique landscape in northeastern Nebraska is not raising pheasants anymore. It's raising corn. High corn prices have made that decision a no-brainer for the private land owners who manage that landscape.
So, we have good data to inform habitat management, but we continue to struggle with policy implications that are critical to change landscapes.
June 15, 2012
Private lands access for hunting
The irony is: many landowners complain about too many deer, but they are slow to give access to hunters. Maybe it is too many bad experiences? Maybe.
But, it wasn't always this way.
I have been digging around in the Library of Congress photo archives in Washington, DC. Today, I found this photo, which shows a completely different view of private lands access. Come fish and hunt all you want to, and then--come on down for dinner!
I thought some of my friends would enjoy this...after their bitter experience of knocking on doors for weeks. By the way...I am looking for a place to take a 15-year old boy deer hunting this fall!
June 14, 2012
CRP: net loss of 90,000 acres in Nebraska
A CRP field. Photo available on-line: Nebraskaland magazine. |
Although NGPC led with the positive (almost 1300 contracts in Nebraska were submitted as applications), the net gain is negative. Watch for effects of landscape change in the near future.
"Outdoorsmen and women rely heavily on Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands to provide habitat for game species, as well as places to hunt. A better than expected general CRP sign-up will help keep most of those places intact. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) will accept 104,298 acres in Nebraska offered under the 43rd CRP general sign-up.
"The USDA received 1,385 offers in Nebraska, of which 1,249 were accepted. There were 113,911 acres offered. In Nebraska, 201,190 CRP acres will expire Sept. 30, representing a net loss of 96,892 acres.
"Nationally, 3.9 million acres will be accepted.
"Without CRP, many game and nongame species would have been displaced or lost. CRP has benefited the nation for more than 25 years in the form of wildlife habitat, hunting and outdoor recreation opportunities and reduced soil erosion off these sensitive acres.
"There are many programs within CRP, both old and new, targeting wildlife habitat, wetland conservation and soil/water quality for landowners who are interested in enrolling. Producers should contact their local Farm Service Agency office for more information."
Civil war and the cattle industry
I am digging around in the Library of Congress collections this week, and found this line drawing. It was published in Harper's Weekly in 1864. Interested in how this relates to wildlife? Read on.
Before the Civil War, most Americans did not eat beef. The carcass was too large to eat, without refrigeration, and most folks thought it tasted odd. Game animals and hogs were the staple of most farms. But, the Civil War required massive amounts of food for large armies. The beef industry was born, and this document clearly shows the magnitude of the herds that were driven with the army.
As the Civil War ended, the Homestead Act had been established. The move west was on, and cattle soon replaced bison on the Plains. There were many reasons for the downfall of bison, but competition with domestic cattle was certainly one driver, albeit a minor one perhaps, in the push to clear the Plains of bison.
The notes below this drawing are also intriguing. They describe the chore of bringing along the beef:
"Confederate cattle raid Sept. 16th 1864. Genl. Wade Hampden [sic] suddenly appeared at Coggins point in the rear of the army, on the James river, and carried off the entire beef supply, about 2500 head of cattle. The rebel soldiers were much inclined to joke with the pickets on the loss of their meat rations; the Union men, on the other hand, thanked them heartily for removing the tough remnants of herds that had been driven behind the army all summer and which were at once replaced by a fresh stock much fitter for the table."
This is why I am addicted to archives...
Before the Civil War, most Americans did not eat beef. The carcass was too large to eat, without refrigeration, and most folks thought it tasted odd. Game animals and hogs were the staple of most farms. But, the Civil War required massive amounts of food for large armies. The beef industry was born, and this document clearly shows the magnitude of the herds that were driven with the army.
As the Civil War ended, the Homestead Act had been established. The move west was on, and cattle soon replaced bison on the Plains. There were many reasons for the downfall of bison, but competition with domestic cattle was certainly one driver, albeit a minor one perhaps, in the push to clear the Plains of bison.
The notes below this drawing are also intriguing. They describe the chore of bringing along the beef:
"Confederate cattle raid Sept. 16th 1864. Genl. Wade Hampden [sic] suddenly appeared at Coggins point in the rear of the army, on the James river, and carried off the entire beef supply, about 2500 head of cattle. The rebel soldiers were much inclined to joke with the pickets on the loss of their meat rations; the Union men, on the other hand, thanked them heartily for removing the tough remnants of herds that had been driven behind the army all summer and which were at once replaced by a fresh stock much fitter for the table."
This is why I am addicted to archives...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)